Diversity versus Excellence
There is a growing movement in all walks of life across America to promote diversity. This movement is active in college admissions, the work force, military admittance, and many other walks of life. Throughout the country universities have been reserving admission spots and using quotas for diverse students as part of affirmative action. Less qualified foreign and minority students should always be required to compete directly with equally or higher qualified white students. In fact admission standards should be totally race and gender blind. Excellence should always take priority over diversity. Affirmative action should be removed from higher educational admission policies altogether. However, liberals appear to control the agenda with respect to affirmative action.
In May of 2003 the University of Michigan was sued by a group of white applicants who were denied admission to the University’s graduate school because they were white. The main focus behind this lawsuit was whether affirmative action should take place in college admission policies. The facts disclosed that less qualified applicants of diverse minorities with lower test scores were admitted at the expense of better-qualified white applicants. The University of Michigan did not deny the plaintiff’s claim and argued that diversity is an essential element of current American society. Read more…
As college athletics grows and continues to bring large financial gain to universities and corporate sponsors, the debate over paying college athletes persists. Some people think that a fully paid scholarship for these students is fairly enough for talented individuals while others claim that ‘big bucks’ might tempt them to leave the college early for participating in the pros. Despite the variety of opinions the reasonable decision should be implemented in near future in order to help college athletes to make the decisions concerning their future in a free way, not being limited by different restrictions.
According to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules, any player under scholarship is forbidden from having a full-time or part-time job (David Nelson). Thus, college athletes do not have an opportunity to earn extra money as the majority of students do. Scholarship is their only way of having money, but it hardly covers education fees, not saying about personal needs. College athletes the same as other students need to buy food, cloths, spend money to rent an apartment or to entertain with friends. Read more…
In America, we are free to live and to dress in any way desired. So why are so many people suggesting that elementary students should be required to wear uniforms? Uniforms take away the individuality of a student, this meaning that one couldn’t express themselves in their own way. We must really think about why we would make our children wear uniforms, what is the purpose?
Those who argue that elementary students should be required to wear uniforms are forgetting that we are still living in America. If a parent wants his/her child to wear a uniform, then they should send the child to a private school. Then all elementary students won’t have to wear uniforms just because other parents want their own child to wear a uniform.
Numerous people, myself included, don’t concur that elementary students should have to wear uniforms, because it could take their uniqueness away, it is called Freedom of Expression! Parents also argue that wearing uniforms could be too sheltering and could lower a child’s self esteem. Here is one anonymous student’s idea about uniforms; Uniforms are all about making all the kids the same… Hey, why don’t we just get rid of names? Numbers are easier. We’ll give them numbers. So it is my belief that student shouldn’t be made to wear uniforms unless they attend a private school. Read more…
ESTABLISHING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
When we talk about the purposes of education we may be referring to purposes at one or more of the following levels: nation, state, school district, school, and subject? Grade, unit plan, or lesson plan. Although there is no perfect agreement, most educators use the terms goals and objective to distinguish among levels of purpose with goals being broader and objectives being more specific. All end points however are influenced by social forces and by prevailing philosophies or theories of education. Social forces and philosophies combing to shape the goals adopted at the national or state level. Changes in society include shifts in emphasis amount the various influences such as the family, peer groups, social class and the economy.
Although goals are important guides in education, they cannot be directly observed or evaluated; rather, they are broad statements that denote a desired and valued competency, a theme or concern that applies to education in general. Sometimes the most general goals are called aims. Read more…
