Can a United States president, a Greek philosopher, an influential astronomer, and world-class author disagree on a single, seemingly simple topic? One that is ever present in the everyday life of all throughout the world? How can names like Aristotle, Emerson, Galileo, and Garfield disagree on such a topic as education? It seems simple enough, but education is nearly impossible to define, as it has clear answers, such as the amount of schooling one has endured, and also complicated responses, including leadership and street smarts. Education is different for everyone, hence the inability to come up with one uniform definition. Some forms of education are tested on the standardized exams that are thrust upon students annually, while others are tested in real-life situations. Scoring high marks on these standardized examinations requires and tests for one type of education, while others are needed in the form of knowledge, toleration, and most importantly, action. Learning and retaining information can only enhance the life of an intellectual, giving the gift of knowledge as well as the responsibility of using that knowledge for the greater good of society. An educated person should also be tolerant of others’ opinions and be able to entertain those beliefs in discussion, even though the two views may differ greatly. While being formally educated is admirable, not being able, or not knowing when, to use that knowledge defeats the entire purpose of that formal education. As Herbert Spencer once noted, “the great aim of education is not knowledge but action” (McKenzie). The action is that of doing something for the greater good of others, whether it be all of humanity or simply one individual.
There are many different forms of intelligence, including those that are tested by the standardized exams, which are annually thrust in front of every student in America. It does not take extreme intelligence to score high on these exams; only the ability to answer certain types of questions and the ability to memorize information learned from a book are needed. However, not all education can be obtained as easily as from a book. It takes intelligence of another sort to be able to work effectively under different circumstances or to lead people towards a common goal. While some people who score well on standardized tests are good overall students and people, for many that is their only form of intelligence. Retaining information and obtaining as much knowledge as possible are, of course, not a bad thing, but is there really a point to being an intellect who does nothing with their knowledge? Don Herold agrees, “there is nobody so irritating as somebody with less intelligence and more sense than we have” (McKenzie). It is possible, and perhaps probable, that the most intelligent person in the world could have absolutely no common sense and be worthless to society. It is not sufficient to have only one form of education, but rather it is better to diversify one’s knowledge, as well as the source of that knowledge, and also to be tolerant of those who have differing opinions. Read more…